Human perception of clusters in Gaussian-distributed fields of dots

Anthony D. Cate, Ph.D.

Roanoke College

Background

What is a cluster?

These slides available at: https://floruit.xyz/static/wic/Cate_CVCSN_2024.html

  • Many studies of dot perception, including with regard to estimating number
  • Nearly always “randomly distributed” (Poisson)
  • Never Gaussian

Allik & Tuulmets (1991)

Anobile, Cicchini & Burr (2013)

Im, Zhong & Halberda (2016)

Methods

Cluster selection task

Different stimulus distributions

 

Animations looping through all 180 patterns viewed by participants

Gaussian, \(\sigma\) = 1.7

Gaussian, \(\sigma\) = 2.0

Poisson

Gaussian, \(\sigma\) = 4.0, with Poisson “pedestal”

Measure density of selected clusters

Use convex hull to measure area of clusters

Simulated clusters from expanding rings


















Baseline data for comparison

Assume that simplest cluster formation method is to select all dots within a given radius of display center

Recalculate cluster measurements for clusters of different numbers of dots: from 1 to 100 dots

Results

Different sized dot clusters chosen by participants

Gaussian, \(\sigma\) = 1.7

Gaussian, \(\sigma\) = 2.0

Poisson

Gaussian, \(\sigma\) = 4.0, with Poisson “pedestal”

Significance of the cluster densities chosen by participants

Linear mixed effects regression: Type II Wald \(\chi^2\) = 180.26, p << 0.001

Green ribbon = standard error of the mean for simulated baseline data (from 180 trials) \(y = f(x) = cluster\ density(number\ of\ dots)\)

Yellow dots = inflection points (\(y'' = 0\))

Purple dot = maximum of Gaussian curvature \(\kappa\) of baseline data curve \[ \kappa\left(x\right) = \frac{{\lvert}y''{\rvert}}{\left(1 + \left(y'\right)^2\right)^\frac{3}{2}} \]

Gaussian Distributed Dots, STD = 1.7

Linear mixed effects regression: Type II Wald \(\chi^2\) = 180.26, p << 0.001

Gaussian Distributed Dots, STD = 2.0

Linear mixed effects regression: Type II Wald \(\chi^2\) = 209.03, p << 0.001

Poisson distributed points

Linear mixed effects regression: Type II Wald \(\chi^2\) = 87.5, p << 0.001

Gaussian Distributed with Poisson “pedestal”

Linear mixed effects regression: Type II Wald \(\chi^2\) = 190.63, p << 0.001

Discussion

Power Law Selection of Cluster Density

  • Straight lines on log-log axes indicate power functions:

  • \(f(x) = ax^k + b\)

  • Log-log slope = the exponent (\(k\)), intercept = slope (\(a\))

  • Stevens’ Power Law: intensity of perceptual phenomena follow power functions

    • Different phenomena characterized by different exponents
  • Cluster density: negative slopes -> negative exponents

    • Small quantities of dots form highly dense clusters with rapid reduction in density after a few tens of dots
    • Then only very gradual reduction in density

Takeaway points

  1. Participants sensitive to global features of dot distributions when selecting clusters
    • But cluster features don’t just mirror stimulus properties
    • Participants’ data don’t match the simulated baseline data
    • Power law exponent for cluster density may match spatial derivative of density at “maximum of curvature” of display, for Gaussian displays only



  1. This occurs between subjects.
    • They don’t all confer with each other beforehand so that their mean responses will fit a log-log line
    • Yet it’s like each individual knows to adjust their criterion for cluster density depending on their preference for cluster size
  • Thank you!


  • Thanks to Maria Boylan, Amanda Scarangela, Ellington Cooke